user-pic

Jason Tang

  • Commented on Authors vs. Contributors
    "My philosophy is to share credit liberally. There's plenty to go around. An author is a contributor and vice versa. Maintainership is different. Someone must guide the project for the long term. If the demarcation of that responsibility must exist,...
  • Commented on Authors vs. Contributors
    I would ask the question 'What is the point?'. If its driven by as you say '..placing too much self-importance on myself as the creator of a distribution' then sure go ahead. However its probably then fair to break it...
  • Commented on Exciting updates to MetaCPAN
    It works but was a little confused when presented with a json payload when I followed the link in the email. Nice work...
Subscribe to feed Recent Actions from Jason Tang

  • http://www.wgz.org/chromatic/ commented on Authors vs. Contributors

    My philosophy is to share credit liberally. There's plenty to go around. An author is a contributor and vice versa.

    Maintainership is different. Someone must guide the project for the long term. If the demarcation of that responsibility must exist, make it explicit.

  • Vyacheslav Matyukhin commented on Authors vs. Contributors

    RJBS is very open, but he's also very busy :(
    I've been waiting for my two pull requests to dzil for almost a year now...

  • Chisel commented on Authors vs. Contributors

    Interesting. So maybe Maintainer + Author(s)?

    I'm definitely interested in the long-term direction of the module that set me off on this train of thought. I would feel quite happy with Maintainer and a list of authors.

    I've always credited liberally - any accepted patch, typo fix, or modules that I've borrowed from all get appropriate mentions.

    I'm thinking about the dist.ini/dzil convenience that I'm aspiring towards and wonder how many variations I should aim for. Definitely an idea I need to give a lot more thought to.

  • dagolden.com commented on Authors vs. Contributors

    My off-the-cuff thoughts:

    • "authors" would be people that get listed in META.* metadata vs "contributors" making contributions, but not being on the hook for contact about the module (which is the definition in the CPAN::Meta::Spec)
    • In some licenses, e.g. Apache 2.0, the term "contributor" has specific meaning, whereas "author" would really mean "licensor" in such a license.

    Ultimately, I think it's a fine idea to acknowledge con…

  • Gábor Szabó - גאבור סבו commented on Authors vs. Contributors

    For Padre we have a section called
    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS where we list The Padre development team in ABC order and a separate section for translators.


    Though I am not sure why do we still have them separated.


    In the about box they put a separate "Created by Gábor Szabó" and I did not argue with them but this is a special case as this is an application that has an about box.

Subscribe to feed Responses to Comments from Jason Tang

About blogs.perl.org

blogs.perl.org is a common blogging platform for the Perl community. Written in Perl with a graphic design donated by Six Apart, Ltd.