user-pic

ddumont

  • Website: ddumont.wordpress.com
  • About: I blog about Perl and my modules (mostly Config::Model). I package Perl modules (and some other stuff) for Debian.
  • Commented on Is Perl 6 Being Renamed?
    To send a clear message to the world, it may be better to simultaneously rename Perl6 and move Perl5 to a next major version (Perl 7 ?). I think this would send several messages to the outside world: both communities...
  • Commented on Article: Installation of Image::Magick under Debian
    You can also install libimage-magick-perl version 6.8.9.9 with apt. A more recent version (6.9.2.10) is available in experimental, so it should land in unstable sooner or later. All the best...
  • Commented on Why is the latest version of Devel::ptkdb not on CPAN?
    Looks like latest ptkdb won't stay out of CPAN for long: Matthew got co-maintainer status of ptkdb on CPAN and he's talking with Marco Marazzi to re-use the improvements done on the version of ptkdb hosted on sourceforge. For more...
Subscribe to feed Recent Actions from ddumont

  • Gnustavo commented on Is Perl 6 Being Renamed?

    I think the renaming is long overdue. I hope it's for the good.

    As for the new name I don't particularly like Raku. For a Brazilian Portuguese speaker it sounds harsh. But I think it's mostly about having time to get used to it.

    Some time ago I thought that "Gerl" would be a nice name for Perl 6:

    • The "G" in it could be seen as a "6".
    • It rhymes with Perl and Girl. (At least it does for a non-native English speaker as myself.)
    • It has four letters.
    • It would make it easy to change documentation and tooling names since it would only need to…
  • explorer commented on Is Perl 6 Being Renamed?

    "Perla" ⒫

  • Ovid commented on Is Perl 6 Being Renamed?

    Shenanigans: thanks, fixed! :)

  • Aaron Priven commented on Is Perl 6 Being Renamed?

    In general, I think the "rename Perl 6 to Raku / rename perl 5 as perl 7" is a good solution, but I would suggest that the Perl 5 -> Perl 7 bump should happen only when there is at least something notable to include in it that would otherwise justfy the change. (Native OO system, non-experimental signatures with named parameters, something like that.)

    I mean, the big user-visible improvement in Perl 5.30 was "The upper limit 'n' specifiable in a regular expression quantifier of the form '{m,n}' has been doubled to 65534", which was pretty underwhelming. And so far, the most notable …

Subscribe to feed Responses to Comments from ddumont

About blogs.perl.org

blogs.perl.org is a common blogging platform for the Perl community. Written in Perl and offering the modern features you’ve come to expect in blog platforms, the site is hosted by Dave Cross and Aaron Crane, with a design donated by Six Apart, Ltd.