Please don't use ::Tiny unless it meets the ::Tiny criteria, thanks!
Don’t get me wrong, I really, really, really appreciate effort put into making something as small and efficient as possible.
However, it seems like we have a recent trend of using ::Tiny for things that do not meet the actual criteria of ::Tiny.
That is bad because seeing ::Tiny gives a certain expectation that, when not met, could be surprising, even bad.
Just because it is way less bloaty than something, like say, Moose: still not necessarily “::Tiny”.
Here are the rules Adam Kennedy originally defined for what ::Tiny means:
- The …