Simplest class builder "Object::Simple" 3.17 released!
Simplest class builder "Object::Simple" 3.17 released! I rewrite document in this release. I describe the benefits at first.
Simplest class builder, Mojo::Base porting, fast and less memory
- Simplest class builder. All you learn is only has function!
- Mojo::Base porting. Do you like Mojolicious? If so, this is good choices!
- Fast and less memory. Fast new and accessor method. Memory saving implementation.
I'm Perl Programmer. I LOVE Perl. I want to contribute Perl community and Perl users.
If you improve Mojo::Base is it better to make merge request into Mojolicious and do not spoil namespaces by creating same module with different name? Yes, with Mojolicious we get extra modules, but they are not so big to worry about them.
So, why porting, what is the benefit?
Thank you.
The reason is that I think Mojo::Base is good module and I want to use it as a small part.
This is several years ago.
I use this module in Validator::Custom and DBIx::Custom. It is very good.
I feel weight if these modules use
whole Mojolicious for only Mojo::Base.
Benefits
1. Can work perl 5.8
2. Small, installation is easy in a few seconds.
3. Don't break compatibility at least five years.
Mojolicious is moving forward project because it is web framework.
lagavani
Do you know Mojolicious? Mojolicious is good and popular web application frame work. If you create Perl web lessen, please use Mojolicious.
Mojolicious support "one file" web application. This is easy and interesting!
Yuki: that was a spam bot. If you see a generic-sounding “wow your blog/article is great” comment with a generic link in it (or a link in the name of the commenter)… that is spam 99.99% of the time.
Aristotle
Is that spam? Comment is now removed, but article contains Perl.
You can still see the comment if you log in. If you follow the link you will see that they offer training in the absolute basics of dozens of technologies… for several hundred dollars per course. Perl is just one of these. This isn’t quality content, it’s just quantity so they have something to sell. They even spell it PERL.
So the comment didn’t have anything to do with your article. You just happened to mention Perl – so you got spammed with a comment about Perl. People on other sites who write posts about other things get spammed with comments about those other things.
In fact I can prove very simply that the comment didn’t have anything to do with your article: several other blogs.perl.org entries by other users got spammed with almost identical comments by the same commenter.
Unlike email spam the spammer doesn’t care about you either, he just wants to get linked by lots of different sites so that Google will give him a better ranking. But Google has become a lot smarter over the years and disregards obviously spammy links, so nowadays the comment must have something to do with the topic of the page it is on. That’s why you got spam about PERL training while other sites will get spam about (for example) AngularJS training.
Aristotle
thanks for describing details! I confirm the comment is spam.