RFC: Limiting grant duration
I am thinking about adding this to the grants operation rules:
If the grant does not finish within three times of the proposed duration or within two years, the grant will be considered a failure.
First of all, it should be noted that it won't affect most grants (see the reason 2).
Reason 1: Budget structure & allocation to new grants
TPF does not allow over-allocation of the budget. If we have 3 x $3,000 grants running and our budget is $9,000, no more grants can be funded.
If a grant worth $3,000 is running for five years, this $3,000 is stuck in the TPF safe. Even if we get good proposal, we cannot fund it using this money.
The aim is to increase liquidity of the fund.
Reason 2: If a grant runs more than a year, chance of failure increases
During 2009-2013, we managed 17 grants. Here is the breakdown:
| Grant | Result | Proposed | Actual |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | Success | 4 | 4 |
| B | Success | 6 | 7 |
| C | Success | 4 | 12 |
| D | Success | 3 | 5 |
| E | Success | 6 | 9 |
| F | Success | 2 | 5 |
| G | Success | 3 | 3 |
| H | Success | 4 | 2 |
| I | Success | 1 | 11 |
| J | Success | 3 | 8 |
| K | Success | 2 | 5 |
| L | Success | 4 | 9 |
| M | Failure | 3 | 12 |
| N | Failure | - | 13 |
| O | Failure | 7 | 41 |
| P | Failure | 3 | 26 |
| Q | Failure | 3 | 32 |
(Proposed/Actual: Duration in months. The grant N did not estimate duration)
Statistically, all the grant failed if they ran for more than a year. And except for the grants C and I, all of them failed after running more than 2.5 times of the proposed duration.
Would like to have your feedback.
Ex-Secretary, The Perl Foundation. makoto@perlfoundation.org | https://x.com/heismakoto